Employer No-Poach and Related Restrictive Agreements Face Continued Scrutiny

-

Three recent developments demonstrate that both the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and courts around the country are continuing to scrutinize employer agreements that in any way restrict employee mobility.

First, in January 2021, the Antitrust Division of the DOJ filed its first criminal indictment against two outpatient medical care facilities alleging that as competitors, the two companies engaged in a conspiracy to suppress competition between them by agreeing not to solicit each other’s senior-level employees.  See U.S. v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC and SCAI Holdings, LLC, No. 3-21-cr-0011-L, in the United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.   Currently pending before the Court is the employer-defendants’ motion to dismiss.

Second, in April 2021, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that a no-poaching agreement between trucking companies was unenforceable and against public policy because it created a “probability of harm to the public.”  See Pittsburgh Logistic Systems v. Beemac Trucking, LLC and Beemac Logistics, LLC, 2021 WL 1676399 (Pa. Apr. 29, 2021). 

Third, in May 2021, a federal district court in New York told parties settling a Fair Labor Standards Act case that the no-rehire provision in the proposed settlement agreement was “highly restrictive” and at odds with federal labor law.  In an order, the Court directed the parties to either agree to the Court’s striking of the no-rehire clause or submit an alternative settlement agreement or status update.  See Flores v. Greenwich BBQ LLC et al., No. 1:20-cv-09514, United States District Court, Southern District of  New York. 

These cases serve as a reminder to employers that no poach and no rehire agreements can be highly problematic and should be reviewed with counsel to determine whether, under current precedent, they are enforceable.


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

(Un)Intended Consequences? Can Employers be Sued Under the New Texas Heartbeat Act?

-
On September 1, 2021, the most restrictive abortion law in the country went into effect in Texas.  Known as the "Texas Heartbeat Act," the statute, which creates a new subchapter of Chapter 171 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, privatizes a right of action against people who aid and abet abortions in violation of the new law. More specifically, the statute provides that "any person" other than a state actor can bring an action against "any person" who: knowingly engages in [or intends to engage in] conduct that aids or abets the performance or   inducement of an abortion , including paying for or reimbursing the costs of an abortion through insurance or otherwise, if the abortion is performed or induced in violation of this subchapter, regardless of whether the person knew or should have known that the abortion would be performed or induced in violation of this subchapter. ..(emphasis added). How could this affect employers?   First, how broadly will c
Read more

Ten Things Texas Employers Need to Know About the New "No Need for a Firearm Carry Permit" Law

-
 At a time when gun violence is increasing across the country, and based on publicly available data, Texas currently ranks second in the nation (behind Illinois) in mass shootings for 2021, the Texas Legislature enacted the Firearm Carry Act of 2021.  Here's what Texas employers need to know: 1.     The effective date of the new law is September 1, 2021. 2.     The law applies to persons 21 years of age or older and not otherwise prohibited by state or federal law from possessing a firearm, and to those 18 years or older in the military. 3.    Persons who meet the criteria in #2 above will be able to carry a firearm without a government issued license or permit, which means they will not be required to take gun safety and handling courses as a prerequisite to carrying. 4.     The law does not prohibit an employer from prohibiting an employee who lawfully carries without a permit from possessing the firearm on the employer's premises. 5.       An employer must follow the postin
Read more

Are Private Employers Ready for the New Sexual Harassment Laws in Texas?

-
Texas is considered an employer-friendly state, so it may come as quite a surprise that several bills that significantly impact sex harassment law passed, without fanfare, in the last legislative session, and go into effect today, September 1, 2021.  More specifically, the legislature amended several sections of Chapter 21 of the Texas Labor Code, which includes the state's version of Title VII, to be more in line with the laws of California.  Here's what employers need to know: First, the legislature amended Chapter 21 to provide that with respect to sexual harassment , an "employer" is a person who employs 1 or more employees or "acts directly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee."   What does this mean and why does it matter?   Until today, Chapter 21 has applied to employers with 15 or more employees; therefore, this amendment now covers virtually every employer with respect to sex harassment claims.  It also means that individual s
Read more